Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 04:25
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 658
68% 547 Pts
64-Core 655
40% 655 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 91.8
62% 79.7 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 59
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 389 390 388 388 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 659
Write 587
Mixed 567
SusWrite 394
124% 552 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 73.7
247% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 270
295% 497 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 155%
Great: 295%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB
9TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 477 472 482 484 481 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 543
Write 270
Mixed 104
SusWrite 465
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 1.8
13% 4.67 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 2.3
3% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54%
Great: 188%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.6 5.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 140
Write 138
Mixed 112
SusWrite 1.5
124% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 59%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 86 85 84 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 200
Write 162
Mixed 89
SusWrite 85.6
168% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 87 86 85 84 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 153
Write 154
Mixed 86
SusWrite 87.3
157% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 87 86 85 84 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 87.4
148% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 163
Write 164
Mixed 65
SusWrite 113
164% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
76% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 64%
ST330006 51NS 3TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
Read 140
Write 133
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 2.6
106% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 47%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
815GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 157
Write 124
Mixed 78
SusWrite 0.4
107% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 68%
ST330006 51NS 3TB
3TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.8% Above average
Read 159
Write 149
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 113
164% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 28.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 50.2
80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback