Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 06:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 109
2-Core 193
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 297
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 26
Parallax 29.8
19% 26.3 fps
MRender 34.2
Gravity 28
Splatting 23.9
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 418
Write 362
Mixed 357
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 42.7
129% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 73.6
76% 122 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 102%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
119GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 98 99 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 83.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 97.9
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback