Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 01:04
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 83.2
83% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 12A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 165
Parallax 175
141% 171 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 145
Splatting 110
115% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0411B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2204 2275 2213 2346 2360 2341 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,242
Write 2,358
Mixed 235
SusWrite 2,290
399% 1,781 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 94.7
328% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 590
631% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 388%
Great: 372%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 188 185 190 184 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
2TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 160 164 164 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 164
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 161
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
318% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 93%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 38.8
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 38
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback