HP Z1 G2 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Z1 G2 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 192F
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 590 60% 484 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% MSI(1462 1128) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 377.19 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 43.2 Parallax 39.1 35% 41.7 fps	MRender 44.2 Gravity 41.4 Splatting 37.2 33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Diss 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 873GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 361 380 405 395 405 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 266 Write 104 Mixed 309 SusWrite 370 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 33.7 144% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 13.3 DQ Mixed 0.9 3% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 93%
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 82GB free Firmware: RVT4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 335 305 304 304 303 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 450 Write 480 Mixed 423 SusWrite 309 94% 415 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 54.2 211% 83.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1.9 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 2.4 54% 117 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 4x4GB 3,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 13.7 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 16 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z1 G2 Workstation Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z1 G2 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E3-1246 v3Intel $200Bench 73%, 2,511 samples	8x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	5x
Xeon E3-1226 v3Intel $256Bench 71%, 2,019 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	10x
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	8x
Quadro K4100MNvidiaBench 16%, 1,157 samples	3x

SSD
MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 89%, 2,574 samples	3x
MX500 2TBCrucial $120Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 2,366 samples	3x
HMT41GU7AFR8C-RD 2x8GBHynixBench 57%, 261 samples	2x
M391B1G73QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 203 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $200

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16