bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 853 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon Gold 5120
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 159
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 143
21% 151 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 384MB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
0.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 1
0% 0.57 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.15%
Great: 68%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 268GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 4.6 13 7 8.9 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 86%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 19,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $212
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback