| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus F2A55-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121009 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 09 '19 at 14:01 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.3%
Above average
|
55% 87.1 Pts
|
27% 201 Pts
|
12% 198 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
14% 17.4 fps
|
16% 19.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 41 32 30 49 46 MB/s
|
25%
Poor
|
32% 43.2 MB/s
|
142% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
111GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 66 58 57 79 78 MB/s
|
41.9%
Average
|
52% 71.1 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
WDC WD10 EZEX-00RKKA0 1TB
777GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 29 30 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
40% 29.4 MB/s
|
113% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.8%
Poor
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
50% 79.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F2A55-M LE Builds (Compare 26 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 4x |
| A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples | 4x |
| Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
| Radeon HD 7540DAMDBench 3%, 4,337 samples | 2x |
| GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 31% - Below average | Total price: $340 |