Toshiba Satellite S75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Toshiba Satellite S75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 08 '19 at 19:11
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 188 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 507 51% 414 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA82) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3282 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.51% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 6.69 Parallax 6.72 4% 6.14 fps	MRender 9.19 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.83 5% 6.45 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.51% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 297GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 418 409 409 409 408 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 412 Mixed 408 SusWrite 413 96% 425 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 49.8 171% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 254 198% 274 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 128%
Jmicron Generic 128GB 413 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 119GB free Firmware: 1507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.4% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 34.5 Mixed 34.9 SusWrite 41.6 8% 37 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 11.3 37% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 69%
OTG OTG 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 172GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 17%
SDXC Card 125GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 68GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 26 26 26 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12% Very poor	Read 28 Write 25.1 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 24.3 34% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1 68% 2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 15.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite S75-A Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	23x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	23x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	4x

SSD
Blue 3D 250GBWD $52Bench 86%, 23,658 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x
PLUS 480 GB 480GBSandiskBench 45%, 8,604 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73CB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 473 samples	11x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	3x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $261

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369