Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 05:40
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 261
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 861
85% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,108
69% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2804 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 200
Parallax 7.03
158% 134 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 185
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 212 207 183 175 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 234
Mixed 102
SusWrite 201
140% 191 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1.6
369% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%
Disque virtuel Microsoft 1.5TB
793GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 23 24 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 116
Write 82.7
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 25
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$105
89GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 55 52 61 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 38
Write 60.5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 57.6
30% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
271GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 110
Write 117
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 23.5
91% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 145 145 146 144 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 139
Write 91.1
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 144
150% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
670GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 75 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 70
Write 64.5
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 73.3
74% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.2
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 25.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback