| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120329 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 08 '19 at 04:12 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
64% 105 Pts
|
33% 260 Pts
|
18% 291 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
2.01%
Terrible
|
2% 2.35 fps
|
2% 2.84 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 431 428 402 400 297 MB/s
|
88.2%
Excellent
|
94% 419 MB/s
|
99% 33 MB/s
|
244% 328 MB/s
|
|
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
12% 54.4 MB/s
|
26% 7.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
47.7%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
57% 70.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2675QMIntelBench 58%, 1,033 samples | 51x |
| Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 27x |
| Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 58x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |