Asrock X370 Killer SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 838
77% 644 Pts
64-Core 1,184
73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 197
Parallax 193
139% 187 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 181
Splatting 133
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 50 50 50 44 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 512
Write 436
Mixed 404
SusWrite 69.2
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 45
158% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 44.1
46% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78%
Great: 107%
Kingston SVP100S296G 96GB
42GB free
Firmware: CJR10202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 185 175 182 186 187 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 223
Write 172
Mixed 125
SusWrite 182
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 21.1
77% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 76.6
DQ Mixed 13.8
21% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 69%
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB
58GB free
Firmware: D110225a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 107 127 121 126 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 220
Write 101
Mixed 124
SusWrite 125
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 13.4
47% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 14
12% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 30%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
600GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1610 1597 1657 1641 1688 1206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,389
Write 1,618
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 1,566
383% 1,715 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 79.7
260% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 936
703% 938 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 314%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
210GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 291 292 292 293 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 490
Mixed 417
SusWrite 313
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 59.6
200% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 364
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
734GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 117 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 64
SusWrite 117
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 96 98 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 96.7
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $614
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback