MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 17:57
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 228
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 690
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 1,231
76% 1,231 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 431.86
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 189
Parallax 190
143% 185 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 173
Splatting 126
113% 139 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 126%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,499
Write 2,233
Mixed 1,563
466% 2,098 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 83.5
276% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 727
DQ Mixed 819
620% 839 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
363GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1837 872 587 580 579 578 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 1,752
Mixed 871
SusWrite 838
308% 1,381 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 61.6
221% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 749
600% 848 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 242%
Great: 254%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$40
147GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 91.2
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 75.8
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
242GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 121 120 119 119 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 68.2
Write 75.8
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 120
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2
363% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 110%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
663GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 72 72 71 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 95.5
Write 96.1
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 72.1
106% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 61%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
930GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 46 46 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 42.3
Mixed 34
SusWrite 44.8
55% 40.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 52
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 47.4
146% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 21.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI Krait Edition (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $901
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback