Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 15:45
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 78
2-Core 156
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 387
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
MSI(1462 2060) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.58% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.74
1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.58%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$65
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 23 25 24 26 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 343
Write 49.1
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 26.1
26% 121 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 20.9
92% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 43.9
DQ Mixed 85
62% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 119%
External Disk 0 2TB
496GB free
Firmware: .151
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 68 67 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 90.3
Write 86.3
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 66.9
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 76%
Inateck ASM1153E 4TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 145 144 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 164
Write 149
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 145
173% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback