Asrock H67M-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H67M-ITX  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 06:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 181
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 505
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 95 92 78 92 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 257
Write 246
Mixed 226
SusWrite 105
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 28.7
99% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 144
123% 180 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 91%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
706GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 312 316 317 318 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 328
Write 269
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 304
179% 247 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
298% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 181%
Great: 213%
silicon-power 32GB
25GB free, PID 3d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 12.2
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 7.2
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KBN1333D3N9/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-ITX Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H67M-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback