Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 22:00
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$113
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.9% Good
1-Core 103
2-Core 197
71% 150 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 603
62% 487 Pts
64-Core 832
56% 832 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Asus(1043 838B) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 19.6
16% 46.9 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 49.2
18% 55.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 295 289 289 295 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 283
Mixed 254
SusWrite 292
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 38
143% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 228
194% 284 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$86
69GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 12.8
Write 14.9
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 24.3
12% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
481GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 57.7
Write 56.1
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 57.9
66% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 19,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $327
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $270Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200AMD RX 590 $180Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $58
Intel Core i7-9700K $369Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback