TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP530U3C-A05EE
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121103
Uptime13.3 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 19:30
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 71
45% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 119
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 50.3%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.78 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.35
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.35%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 66 52 37 77 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 427
Write 352
Mixed 303
SusWrite 84.9
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 19.7
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 105
100% 162 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 52.8%
 Great: 82%
Sandisk i100 24GB
18GB free
Firmware: 11.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 77 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 346
Write 78.4
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 79.1
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 6.6
25% 7.83 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 11.4
10% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 27.1%
 Great: 31%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E 500GB
426GB free
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 92 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 85.4
Write 85.2
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 92.8
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 51.1%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 859B CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 45.7%
 Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel  $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples95x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples38x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples32x
GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples167x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples16x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples5x
SSD
i100 24GBSandiskBench 28%, 942 samples20x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples8x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples8x
RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 808 samples39x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F BA92-09550A 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 139 samples11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback