Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 02:07
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$89
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 924
92% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 72
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 89.8
59% 78.3 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 58.3
54% 67.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2334 810 806 815 813 809 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,685
Write 2,582
Mixed 1,915
SusWrite 1,065
462% 2,062 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 96.7
323% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,307
DQ Write 871
DQ Mixed 1101
818% 1,093 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 321%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
39GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 152 152 152 152 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 446
Mixed 402
SusWrite 186
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 55.4
187% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 115%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
155GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 107 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 111
Write 94.8
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 106
61% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 75%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB
292GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 215 215 215 215 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 219
Mixed 225
SusWrite 214
304% 224 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 17
1,318% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 17.7
1,374% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 147%
Great: 187%
Intenso Rainbow Line 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 7.8
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 11
13% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.3% Good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 24.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,460
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback