Asus CM6870

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6870  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6870
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121225
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 13 '16 at 13:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 376
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 8597) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7570
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.63% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 8
6% 7.54 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 9.43
7% 8.86 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 175
Mixed 140
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 2.72
4K Mixed 0.29
129% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
19GB free
Firmware: VM100-38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 44
Write 48.3
Mixed 30.9
31% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.38
85% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6870 Builds (Compare 654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6870

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback