Acer Aspire A515-41G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardBR Wartortle_BS
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170808
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 69
2-Core 110
49% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 174
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 500
Acer(1025 1210) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.8.1
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 17.9
12% 19.5 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 25.6
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 78 96 100 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 105
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 91.4
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P21FC8T1-BSKS 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-41G Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback