bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 12 '16 at 23:44
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 565
61% 484 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro 580 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 15.6
13% 14.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 24.4
15% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 550GB
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 882
Write 841
Mixed 886
194% 870 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 15.3
92% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 15.2
57% 116 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 121%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 1315 BLS8G4S240FSD.16FAR 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
117% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 28.5
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 117%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback