Lenovo 20HMS0J50N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20HMS0J50N  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HMS0J50N
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '19 at 10:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 59%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 71
2-Core 114
54% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 193
24% 186 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 5062) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 6.38
6% 7.65 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 12.4
7% 7.85 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 98 130 132 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 455
Write 301
Mixed 335
SusWrite 119
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 29.8
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 196
135% 166 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 63%
Great: 124%
Verbatim STORE N GO 247GB
179GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 27 31 29 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 109
Write 52.5
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 28.4
62% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
132% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback