Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 19:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 154
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 246
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.7% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 126
Parallax 124
64% 109 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 91.4
Splatting 99.4
81% 99.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 322 268 266 261 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 452
Write 408
Mixed 285
SusWrite 275
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 40.5
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 218
166% 225 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
916GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 183 183 180 180 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 185
Mixed 124
SusWrite 180
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D21BCT1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 16.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 11.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback