Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SCL/X9SCM
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '19 at 17:43
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 127 51% 84.2 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 354 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 77%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 873GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 82 72 78 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 75.2 Write 71.2 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 74.3 51% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Winbond 25X/Q Series 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 8 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.7% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 17.9 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	3x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 159 samples	3x
M391B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 67 samples	1x
9965525-026.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 49%, 115 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $74

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16