Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3780 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 05:27
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 691
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
MSI(1462 8A96) 1GB
CLim: 942 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 21.3
14% 18.3 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 21
Splatting 15.2
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 65.3
60% 71.2 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 69.9
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1672 531 523 531 530 536 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 2453
Mixed 1,468
SusWrite 720
343% 1,515 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 87.1
311% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 1330
DQ Mixed 1,489
1,064% 1,352 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 254%
Great: 284%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 137 129 98 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 346
Write 354
Mixed 314
SusWrite 105
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 44.3
146% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 186
142% 193 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 113 121 120 118 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 83.7
Write 122
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 115
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
26GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65% Good
Read 152
Write 141
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 73.9
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
402GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 91 91 90 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 53.3
Write 82.7
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 89.9
54% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 90%
Patriot Memory 32GB
16GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4 2.1 6.8 6.3 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 5
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.4
62% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 9%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
80GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 18 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 31.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 17.4
38% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
104% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX EXTREME Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $908
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback