Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateSep 28 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 108
50% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 197
24% 185 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
AMD(1002 0123) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.65% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 8.25
6% 7.94 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.87
6% 6.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.65%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01b10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 79 87 57 83 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 98
Write 46.8
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 81.8
16% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 10.5
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 40.3
DQ Mixed 25.2
21% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
701GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 160 162 163 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 155
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback