Asrock 890GX Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 890GX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '16 at 14:39
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 99.9
51% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 284
29% 237 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.160.769
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 47
Reflection 57
Parallax 79.7
38% 61.2 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 77
53% 63.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 31.2
Write 235
Mixed 365
49% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 17.2
71% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 13.1
28% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50% Average
Read 97.4
Write 76.7
Mixed 75.9
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.14
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
209GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 79
Write 84.3
Mixed 82.8
62% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.13
62% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GB
800, 200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 890GX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 890GX Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback