HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bw0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8333
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 54.7
2-Core 100
40% 68.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 143
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8333) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 4.97
3% 4.29 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 3.61
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT23H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 153 149 149 135 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 434
Write 418
Mixed 371
SusWrite 150
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 37.1
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 33.7
40% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
928GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 112 113 129 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 119
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 119
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
231% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-bw0xx Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback