HP HPE-500f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP HPE-500f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateSep 25 '19 at 23:09
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 46
2-Core 89.7
47% 72 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 232
24% 196 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Device(1B0A 9096) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 2.15
Parallax 1.91
2% 2.08 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 2.13
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair CMFSSD-256GBG2D 256GB
112GB free
Firmware: VBM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 87.8
Mixed 162
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 7.4
41% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 34%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.5
Write 36
Mixed 60.5
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-493.A00LF 99U5402-493.A00LF Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-500f Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-500f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $204
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback