Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '19 at 03:16
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 130 2-Core 258 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 756 79% 633 Pts	64-Core 750 46% 750 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.7% Average	Lighting 51.7 Reflection 53.7 Parallax 50.9 42% 52.1 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 54 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 112 86 82 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 497 Write 131 Mixed 146 SusWrite 107 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 73.8 4K Mixed 16.9 103% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 58.3 89% 176 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 79%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: SC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 148 150 148 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 163 Write 166 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 148 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB 13,141 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 13.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,192x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	686x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	308x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	208x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	206x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	88x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	118x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $353

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16