Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X470-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 22:28
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 723
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1115 MHz, MLim: 1390 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 88.1
60% 76 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 83.5
59% 70.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 465 467 461 403 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 469
Mixed 445
SusWrite 439
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 52
168% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 298
245% 349 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Intenso Sata III 128GB
35GB free
Firmware: O0617A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 154 154 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 510
Write 155
Mixed 215
SusWrite 154
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 35.6
128% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 150
126% 186 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 177 179 179 181 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 141
Mixed 79
SusWrite 179
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
443GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 157 160 159 160 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 189
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 159
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
730GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 180 183 179 183 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 173
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 182
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 45.6
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 37.5
109% 38.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 131%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $661
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback