Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2175 149 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 66.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 235 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 846 76% 641 Pts	64-Core 1,988 123% 1,988 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB 633 User benchmarks, average bench 267% 804GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA71HAQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 1953 1956 1172 1152 1160 1165 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 1,926 Write 1,858 Mixed 1,330 SusWrite 1,426 367% 1,635 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 70.3 242% 89 MB/s	DQ Read 1,080 DQ Write 876 DQ Mixed 976 731% 977 MB/s
Poor: 184% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 321%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 196 195 199 199 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 101 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 197 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40BB2-CTD 4x16GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 52.9 MC Mixed 35.1 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 10.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 135%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	370x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	347x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	328x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	273x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	219x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	199x

RAM
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 370 samples	90x
M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 410 samples	88x
M393A2K40CB2-CVF 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 150 samples	65x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16