HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 184A
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 09:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample Mobile 2585_A1
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 79.3
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 90
50% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual Graphics
HP(103C 184A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.38
4% 6.11 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 6.52
5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 249 175 115 119 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 367
Write 294
Mixed 320
SusWrite 172
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 26.9
79% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 144
117% 167 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion g6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 3,245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback