HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150116
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 23 '19 at 07:38
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 128
52% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 498
45% 380 Pts
64-Core 1,239
77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63%
Great: 65%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 31.6
20% 26.7 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 21.9
23% 29 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 38
20% 29.7 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 27.1
26% 32 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 195 221 216 132 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 390
Write 239
Mixed 268
SusWrite 191
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 22.8
74% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 177
142% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7BFR4C-RD 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.5% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback