Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3P

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3P (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091120
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '19 at 04:57
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 59.3 1-Core 60 2-Core 104 45% 74.5 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 155 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% EVGA(3842 1360) 768MB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 14.3 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 12.7 12% 14.5 fps	MRender 19.5 Gravity 14.5 Splatting 14.4 13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 151 141 144 144 142 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50% Above average	Read 198 Write 188 Mixed 174 SusWrite 147 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 29.9 99% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 40.4 34% 47 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 108%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 57GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 112 122 104 114 113 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 128 Write 111 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 111 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 61.8 Write 3 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 0.1 15% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 10.6 26% 9.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD3P Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3P

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	16x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	13x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	3x

SSD
P4-120 120GBBench 63%, 1,681 samples	4x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	3x
XPG SX900 256GBAdata $164Bench 77%, 6,726 samples	3x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	15x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16