Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 141
60% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 414
39% 323 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS-512
Nvidia(10DE 0502) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 9.73
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 3.38
8% 7.28 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 5.78
6% 6.82 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 387
Mixed 325
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 21.9
106% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 22
50% 102 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 131 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 131
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 86%
USB3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 72 69 80 83 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 89.3
Write 69.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 77
94% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 92%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.7 5.7 5.4 5.7 5.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 2.8
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 5.5
10% 9.72 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-059.A00LF 99U5402-059.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback