Lenovo 4351CTO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4351CTO (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '19 at 10:57
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 86.6 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 479 49% 398 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 04B8) CLim: 1224 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 31.6 Parallax 30.6 21% 29.3 fps	MRender 30.7 Gravity 25.4 Splatting 34.5 25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 249 Write 236 Mixed 227 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 32.6 109% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 150 120% 166 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$19 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 142GB free Firmware: 3E02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 4,104 Write 32.5 Mixed 58 1,001% 1,398 MB/s	4K Read 458 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.5 19,376% 154 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 8,475 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 693GB free Firmware: 0108 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 93.7 Write 130 Mixed 88 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 202% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 0502 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 99 Write 67.5 Mixed 58.5 56% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1881ED58E9 RMR1881ED58E9 Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 30.1 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4351CTO Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

System: Lenovo 4351CTO

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2609 v2IntelBench 60%, 410 samples	3x
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples	2x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	2x

RAM
RMR1881ED58E9 RMR1881ED58E9 Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C Hynix HMT351U7BFR8C 16GBUnknownBench 81%, 11 samples	3x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B1G73QH0- Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C M393B1G73QH0- Hynix HMT41GR7AFR8C 80GBSamsungBench 79%, 2 samples	2x
M393B5270CH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 44 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $565

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16