MSI H55M-E33(MS-7636)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7636
MotherboardMSI H55M-E33(MS-7636)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '19 at 06:19
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 143
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 342
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Nvidia(10DE 1065) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 10
10% 11.9 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 12
Splatting 13.4
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 171
Mixed 62.6
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
17GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 51.2
37% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
WDC WD25 02ABYS-18B7A0 250GB
92GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 31.8
Write 26.5
Mixed 25.9
35% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
1328, 1328, 1328, 1328 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 11.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-E33(MS-7636) Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H55M-E33(MS-7636)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback