Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateSep 21 '19 at 09:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 221
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 672
63% 526 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$94
CLim: 1606 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 76.8
0% 45.7 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 50.8
47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 318 335 340 337 305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 440
Write 311
Mixed 286
SusWrite 330
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 32.8
116% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 250
218% 324 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
398GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 110 106 99 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 106
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZR CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE F4-3000C16-8GTZR 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback