Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 01:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.85 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 165
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 511
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.155.4
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 46% Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-64M3S 64GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VDA5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 479
Write 185
Mixed 266
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 13.9
82% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 52.2
DQ Mixed 13.8
18% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
621GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 170
Mixed 164
128% 170 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.24
80% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
446GB free
Firmware: CC98 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 73
Write 79.4
Mixed 75.3
57% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.12
56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 19.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 14.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,682 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback