Acer Aspire A315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180727
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 21:44
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 81.9
38% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 271
26% 216 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 8.56
5% 7.71 fps
MRender 7.14
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 9.87
7% 7.88 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 351 364 378 377 410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 477
Write 329
Mixed 383
SusWrite 370
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 28.5
93% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 163
126% 172 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P24HC4N2-BWCS Kingston KHX2400C14S4/8G 12GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-41 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback