Asus P5K-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5K-E  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 13:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 91.2
44% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
PowerColor(148C 2360) 2GB
CLim: 1245 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 30
19% 28.9 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 33.7
23% 27.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 232 34 83 43 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.8% Above average
Read 258
Write 233
Mixed 237
SusWrite 108
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 23.7
95% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 1
50% 119 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
180GB free
Firmware: ES2OA60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 7.7 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 21.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 12.2
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST3160811AS 160GB-$45
119GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 55 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 53.9
Mixed 38
SusWrite 56.7
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5K-E Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $176
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback