Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 03:02
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 132
2-Core 265
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 673
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 86.5
79% 91.5 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 89.8
Splatting 77.3
77% 96.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 427 411 425 413 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 416
Mixed 297
SusWrite 416
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 42.8
162% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 153
160% 266 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
115GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 42 40 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 76.7
Write 68
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 40.6
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB
250GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 37
Write 38.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 36.3
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3L 1600G 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback