Lenovo 20HES4SF00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20HES4SF00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HES4SF00
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 18 '19 at 22:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 60%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 129
57% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 204
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 2245) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.31
Parallax 5.75
6% 7.29 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 11.5
7% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 372 359 382 402 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 281
Write 178
Mixed 304
SusWrite 366
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 32.8
109% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 120
135% 232 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8.2
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback