Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory3.4 GB free of 5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 10:54
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 86
50% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 81.2
8-Core 83.8
11% 82.5 Pts
64-Core 78.7
5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 107GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 129
Write 69.3
Mixed 129
SusWrite 71.4
75% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
195% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x5GB
1 of 1 slots used
5GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback