DELL Studio XPS 435T

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090206
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '19 at 05:56
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 132 61% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 308 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 78 69 59 58 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36% Below average	Read 130 Write 169 Mixed 127 SusWrite 70.4 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 17.5 67% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 105 87% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 412GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 75 76 76 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 65 Write 71.3 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 75.5 48% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 136 140 142 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 60 Write 123 Mixed 86 SusWrite 138 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.6 212% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 92%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 680GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 28.7 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 24 36% 27 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 21%
WD My Book 1130 2TB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 36GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 20.8 35% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 48%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 40GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 19.8 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 21.2 33% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 22%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 55GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.8 9.8 9.3 8.8 9 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 19 Write 11.3 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 9.6 13% 11 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.1 74% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	31x
Core i7 940Intel $150Bench 66%, 2,107 samples	6x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	9x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	13x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $715

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16