TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 18:14
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 117
2-Core 225
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 433
58% 433 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 83.4%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Gainward(10B0 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 68.6
49% 60.7 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 50.7
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 49.6%
 Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 3 3.4 19 4.3 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 416
Write 362
Mixed 247
SusWrite 66.7
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 10.2
51% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 89.8
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 46.1
47% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
857GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 125 96 117 112 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 195
Write 157
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 113
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 88.1%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 1311 M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 99U5584-005.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.8
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 55.3%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples284x
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples174x
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples155x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples154x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples129x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples87x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples40x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples34x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples31x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples89x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples69x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples38x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback