PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (WI-FI AC) (all builds) |
Memory | 26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190702 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '19 at 00:33 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
108%
Outstanding
|
102% 183 Pts
|
104% 849 Pts
|
82% 1,325 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3768) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
|
29.8%
Poor
|
28% 35.7 fps
|
33% 40.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
709GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1224 1211 1212 1144 1154 1252 MB/s
|
229%
Outstanding
|
291% 1,295 MB/s
|
207% 65.6 MB/s
|
369% 590 MB/s
|
![]() WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
960GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 111 110 108 113 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
82% 110 MB/s
|
218% 1.67 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
750GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 55 53 55 MB/s
|
31.1%
Below average
|
38% 51.8 MB/s
|
140% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
![]() Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
62GB free, PID 1000, Samsung USB 128GB
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 36 37 38 35 MB/s
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
49% 36.2 MB/s
|
123% 2.37 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
91% 31.9 GB/s
|
81% 28.3 GB/s
|
71% 56.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $199Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 2,952x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $415Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 269x |
Core i7-8086KIntel $449Bench 91%, 38,086 samples | 262x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 873x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 358x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $615Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 264x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $1,292 |