Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 15 '19 at 12:38
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 749
72% 593 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 365B) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 1.66
4% 3.78 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.34 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$40
111GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 142 143 141 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 132
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 86%
WD WD400JD-19MSA1 40GB
37GB free
Firmware: 14.03G14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.5
Mixed 1.3
1% 1.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 33%
GB0750EAMYB 750GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 40 41 43 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 80.2
Write 68.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 43.8
47% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 63%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
15GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 27 28 38 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 96.6
Write 44
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 33.3
40% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905713-007.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2734 MHz clocked @ 1367 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $236
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback