Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3930-$28 9,606 User benchmarks, average bench 48% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 88.2 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 184 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 184 25% 184 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4508 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 3.28 3% 3.96 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 9.17 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 115 Write 85.8 Mixed 151 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 24.2 109% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 94.2 83% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x4GB-$17 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12.7 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	845x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	470x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	368x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $180

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16