Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '19 at 18:22
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 136
68% 108 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 489
43% 365 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.86
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62.2% Good
Lighting 116
Reflection 114
Parallax 116
94% 115 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 1TB
635GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 366 426 425 423 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 456
Write 420
Mixed 395
SusWrite 402
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 31.3
103% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 198
157% 218 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-009B CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback