Asrock H310M-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180213
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '19 at 17:17
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139 23,493 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 250 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 472 61% 458 Pts	64-Core 474 29% 474 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% PNY(196E 1312) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.9% Very good	Lighting 97.5 Reflection 88.4 Parallax 89.6 79% 91.8 fps	MRender 98.6 Gravity 83.6 Splatting 75.6 69% 85.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 110 111 109 106 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 455 Mixed 389 SusWrite 142 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 48.5 162% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 345 261% 351 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 124%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 326GB free Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 383 399 401 398 402 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 462 Mixed 282 SusWrite 398 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 36 142% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 284 230% 327 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 30.3 MC Mixed 22.6 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 24.6 66% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	322x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	317x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	195x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	174x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	119x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	103x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	39x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	46x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	35x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16